Aye Candy: Morgan Line Steamship Harlan, 1866

9623543622_fe6a542660_cBlank

New renders of the Morgan Line steamship Harlan (seen previously here), that ran a coastwise route between New Orleans, Galveston and Indianola, Texas in the late 1860s and 1870s. Harlan was the last of seven ships built to the same design by Harlan & Hollingsworth for the Morgan Line between 1861 and 1866. The first of these ships, St. Mary’s, was purchased new and converted into the Union warship U.S.S. Hatteras. In 1880, Harlan transported former President Grant and his party from Clinton, on Buffalo Bayou near Houston, to New Orleans.

Full-size images available on Flickr.

Blank

9531800455_40648c78b4_c

9620307881_eda52298ba_c

9620308097_3c32d3df34_c

9623543344_85d2be6d4f_c

9623544042_60a1fa4374_c

9623544462_dc0246363b_c

__________

The Navidad River Wreck

My colleague Ed Cotham passed along a sad news item:

A Victoria, Texas man died Friday [January 1] after impaling his vessel on a sunken Confederate steamboat in the Navidad River about three miles from Lolita. . . .

[Texas Parks and Wildlife district supervisor Rex] Mayes said people have struck the ship wreckage throughout the years, but attempts to mark the area have been unsuccessful.

“We’ve tried to mark it and either people steal the buoys or when we open the flood gates, it washes away,” he said.

During normal water levels the wreckage is submerged, but Friday a low-tide exposed about six inches to a foot of the wreckage, he said.

I visited this wreck in 1990 (twenty years ago already? — sheesh!) with Barto Arnold, then the State Marine Archaeologist with the Texas Historical Commission. I was on the staff of the Texas Maritime Museum at the time, and the Navidad River Wreck was the first shipwreck I ever looked at and help record in any organized way.

I don’t have any photos from that visit, but as I recall the upper parts of the wreck were just barely submerged. Barto did most of the hands-on recording, while my TMM colleague Jerry Moore and I made notes and tried to figure out what we were looking at. I remember vividly Barto describing the regular notches cut into the upper edge of the hull plating, through which wooden beams would pass. All three of us were pretty stumped about what vessel this might be, though all of us recognized that this big, iron-hulled craft was a most unusual sort of ship to turn up in a narrow, South Texas waterway.

In September 1991, a five-person team led by Charlie Pearson of Coastal Environments, a cultural resources management firm, completed an assessment of the Navidad River Wreck, along with two other nearby sites. The Navidad River Wreck was the largest and most significant of these, accounting for ten full days of the team’s time in the field.

Coastal Environments Team
The Coastal Environments field crew (l. to r.): Stephen R. James, Jr., Franklin Fisher, Charles E. Pearson, James Duff and Todd Hannahs.

What they found was a  very substantial iron ship, at least 144 feet (35m) long and more than 6 feet (2m) deep, from the intact bottom plating to the notched, upper edge of the gunwale. Her iron hull plates were either clinker-built, with each row of plates overlapping the row below it, or “sunken and raised,” with rows of plated alternating inboard and outboard of each other. The remains of five massive timber keelsons, port and starboard, remained in place; the largest measuring 20 inches vertically. Although no machinery was present, its original place was marked by a heavy bed of timbers and a single, graceful iron support column once probably braced a single-cylinder, “grasshopper” type steam engine.

SmallNavidadWreck
Profile of the Navidad River Wreck. Figure in red at right added for scale.

Navidad Wreck 2
Cross-section of the Navidad River Wreck, showing the heavy timber bed that originally supported the engine.

The Coastal Environments team believed that a large, iron-hulled steamboat wreck on this (relatively) quiet stretch of the Texas coast would be easy to identify in the historical record. That turned out not to be the case.

CoastalEnvironmentsDivers
Divers from Coastal Environments working at the wreck site, September 1991. At right, the project boat is tied off to the engine mounting column shown in the cross-section above.

One of the leading candidates for the identity of the Navidad River Wreck was Mary Somers (or Mary Sumner), an iron-hulled sidewheel steamboat built at Baltimore in 1839. The 203-ton steamboat was sold to the U.S. Army’s Quartermaster Department in 1846, and reportedly renamed United States in 1848. By 1850, though, she had arrived in Texas and was running out of Indianola – which connects directly to the Navidad River by Matagorda Bay – under her original name. There’s no record of Mary Somers being formally registered in Texas, but there is extensive documentation of her operating here throughout the 1850s.

Indianola
A view of Indianola, Texas, c. 1860. Library of Congress.

No one knows exactly what happened to Mary Somers/United States with the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861. It’s widely believed that, like many other river craft who found their livelihood cut off by the war, she was either chartered or sold to the Confederate government for service as a transport. This, in turn, has led to confusion that she may have served as a blockade runner. She didn’t. Similarly, her reported Confederate service has led to her being described as an “ironclad,” which is also incorrect. (An iron-hulled ship is not an ironclad, any more than a steel-bodied automobile is a tank.)

IndianolaSteamer
This steamboat, shown at lower right in the larger print above, has been speculated to be a depiction of
Mary Somers, which is believed to have been operating at Indianola at the time.

Over two decades since Coastal Environment’s study of the site and identification of Mary Somers (among others) as a possible identification of the wreck, that name has stuck. It happens that way sometimes, but in this case it seems likely correct.

Images and material adapted from Underwater Archaeology Along the Lower Navidad and Lavaca Rivers, Jackson County, Texas by Charles E. Pearson, Stephen R. James, Jr., Kay G. Hudson and James A. Duff (Baton Rouge: Coastal Environments, Inc., May 1993).

This Guy Knew All About the Caney Creek Wreck

pilotcertificatesmall
Pilot’s license issued to Martin Reynolds, December 11, 1876 (3.8MB).

South of Bay City in Matagorda County, in Caney Creek, there’s a sunken sternwheel steamboat. It’s a remarkably well-preserved site, with all the boat’s machinery intact. (That’s quite rare in riverboat wrecks.) But despite 15+ years of (admittedly intermittent) study, the identity of the Caney Creek Wreck remains elusive. Everyone in the county knows it’s there — everyone in the area, it seems, has a not-too-bright brother-in-law who’s hit it with his bass boat — but the name of the steamboat and how it came to be there has been lost in the collective memory of the community.

caneycreek2005
Divers working at Caney Creek Wreck site in 2005. The water tastes as bad as it looks.

Several of Maritime Texas‘ contributors have spent considerable effort over the years recording, analyzing and researching this wreck, most notably Layne Hedrick, who wrote his masters thesis at Texas A&M on the subject.

Which brings us to Martin Reynolds. Years ago, my old friend Randy Jones gave me this pilot’s license (top), issued at Galveston, to Captain Reynolds. This license is a copy (Issue No. 2), issued in December 1876 for operations “on the waters of Pass Cavallo Bar and Matagorda Bay,” to the “head of navigation of the tributaries of Matagorda Bay.” This latter clause included Caney Creek, which at the time was connected to Matagorda Bay by a short canal. If, as seems likely, the Caney Creek Wreck dates from the years before 1875, then Captain Reynolds must have been intimately familiar with this wreck, which likely was the de facto “head of navigation” on the creek — at least for large commercial vessels.

Pilot’s licenses were fundamentally different from masters’ licenses (i.e., to command a seagoing vessel); while the latter required a thorough knowledge of seamanship generally, a pilot’s license required very specific and detailed local knowledge. A pilot had to not only be a good seaman, but also had to demonstrate a complete knowledge of the intricacies of navigating a specific set of waters. The pilot’s license only covered a limited geographic area. He — or she, in a few cases — had to know which shoals were exposed when the wind blew in a certain direction, how the tide would set around an island in the bay, and where were hidden obstructions that, although invisible to the casual eye, could impale and sink a wooden-hulled boat in minutes. All this knowledge was learned by experience; as Mark Twain described in his classic Life on the Mississippi, it was a demanding and intensive apprenticeship. Captain Reynolds would, inevitably, not only have known the navigational hazard created by the Caney Creek Wreck, but undoubtedly as well knew many people in the area with first-hand knowledge of the boat and the circumstances that left it at the bottom of the creek, miles inland from Matagorda Bay.

I don’t know much else about Captain Reynolds; his name doesn’t turn up in published works. It’s entirely possible that Captain Reynolds only worked actively for a short time in the area. Inland steam navigation was settling into a long, slow decline in the 1870s, as railroads expanded rapidly, siphoning off the passenger- and express cargo trade and (notably on the Brazos) setting up actual physical barriers to steamboats in the form of rail trestles. On Matagorda Bay, in particular, the main seaport of Indianola had been devastated by a hurricane the previous year, in 1875. (It would be leveled again, this time for good, in 1886.) The prospects for a licensed steamboat pilot on Matagorda Bay in late 1876 were not especially bright, and getting dimmer. Did Captain Reynolds decide to move on to learn the banks, sandbars and currents of some other area? Perhaps he died soon after, or retired for some other reason. Or is there a trove of historical information on Captain Reynolds still out there, waiting  to be found?

Sure would like to know. But even more, I’d like to sit down with Captain Reynolds for a few minutes and ask, “so what’s the deal with that wreck up on Caney Creek?”

– Andy Hall